Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is a bit better than vivo X50, with a 77.2 score against 73. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has the newer 8.1 Oreo version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's design is older, just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than vivo X50.
The vivo X50 features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a little more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
Vivo X50 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality photos and videos, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB.
The vivo X50 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.