Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is much better than the vivo X50's 73 overall score. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker device than the vivo X50. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS.
Vivo X50 counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X50 has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel count per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures clearer videos and photos than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera with way more MP and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.