Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, getting an 82 score against 78.8. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, we must note that it's also older, a little thicker and a bit heavier. IPhone XR has a display that's very similar to vivo X60 Pro's screen, although the iPhone XR has a way worse 828 x 1792 resolution, a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower pixel number in each inch in the display.
Vivo X60 Pro features a very superior storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory. The iPhone XR features just a bit better performance than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser and slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro has a way better battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.