Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro, getting an 84.2 score against 78.8. IPhone XS's design has the same thickness than the vivo X60 Pro, but it is just a little lighter. IPhone XS counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XS features a little more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The vivo X60 Pro counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 60 fps video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot larger sensor and a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.