Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's score of 78.8. The Google Pixel body is notably lighter than vivo X60 Pro, but it's thicker and was released 5 years before. Vivo X60 Pro has a quite better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro and the Google Pixel have similar displays, because although the Google Pixel has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density. Vivo X60 Pro features a way better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures, faster video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X60 Pro has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.