Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having an 82.5 score against 78.8. Google Pixel 2 XL is an a lot older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro, but Google made it just a little lighter anyway. Google Pixel 2 XL features a little sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and more pixels per screen inch.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and better 60 fps video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 19% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.