Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro's overall score of 78.8. Although Google Pixel 3 is much older and a little bit thicker than the vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of display.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory.
Vivo X60 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 44% more battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.