Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's overall score of 78.8. Google Pixel 3a is an older and a little bit thicker phone than vivo X60 Pro, but Google managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide the user very similar operating system features.
Vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro and the Google Pixel 3a have very similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixels number per display inch.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a camera with a way better resolution, a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The vivo X60 Pro has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 40 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.