Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. Google Pixel 3a XL is an older and just a bit thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro, but Google made it a little bit lighter anyway. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels. The vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.