Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a general score of 81.9 against 78.8. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is older and just a little thicker than the vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Vivo X60 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor, higher video frame rates and a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Vivo X60 Pro has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.