Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, with an 82.9 score against 78.8. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 XL is an older, just a little heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro. Google Pixel 4 XL has a little sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a better pixel density.
The vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.