Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. The Google Pixel 4a construction is a little bit thicker but way lighter than the vivo X60 Pro, and both were only released with a couple of months difference. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should give you identical OS features.
Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. Vivo X60 Pro has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro features superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.