Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting an 87.5 score against 78.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G and vivo X60 Pro were released with only a few months difference, the Google Pixel 4a 5G design is just a little thicker but also just a bit lighter than vivo X60 Pro.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a 5G and vivo X60 Pro have very similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X60 Pro has much more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.