Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting an 89 score against 78.8. Although the Google Pixel 5 and the vivo X60 Pro were only released 6 months apart, Google Pixel 5's construction is just a little bit thicker but also lighter. Vivo X60 Pro features a little better performance than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 and vivo X60 Pro both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen pixel density. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and a back camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.