Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 395 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.9 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's global score of 78.8. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a noticeably newer phone than vivo X60 Pro, but it's somewhat thicker and notably heavier. These phones include Android OS, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the newer 14 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a quite better 1280 x 2800px resolution, a bit larger display and a quite higher screen pixels density. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better memory to install games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because it has more internal storage.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features just a little better hardware performance than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 12 GB more RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features greater battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5600mAh battery size.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design captures a little bit better photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a better resolution back-facing camera, a way larger aperture and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.