Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has an overall score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 overall score. The vivo X60 Pro design is notably newer and incredibly thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's somewhat heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but vivo X60 Pro has newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit better performance than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics co-processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features a very superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 48% greater battery size.
Vivo X60 Pro has a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos, a camera with a much higher resolution, better 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.