Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. Even though vivo X60 Pro is a bit heavier than HTC U Ultra, it's just a bit thinner and newer. Vivo X60 Pro has a more powerful CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel count per inch in the display. The vivo X60 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality, better video frame rate and a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The HTC U Ultra features a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.