Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is slightly better than HTC U11's 77.6 global score. The vivo X60 Pro body is extremely newer and a bit thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the HTC U11. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
HTC U11 has a slightly better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The vivo X60 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos, a camera in the back with way more MP and better video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 40% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.