Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro, having an 82.5 score against 78.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, providing the user some extra features and performance improvements. LG V30S ThinQ's design is lighter and just a little thinner than the vivo X60 Pro, although it was released many years before.
The vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X60 Pro features better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 27 percent greater battery size.
The vivo X60 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.