Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a general score of 81.3 against 78.8. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is incredibly older than the vivo X60 Pro, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater screen pixels density.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back camera with lot more MP.
Vivo X60 Pro features superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.