Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Even being the best we compare here, LG Velvet's design is older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, they both have the same amount of pixels in each screen inch.
The LG Velvet has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet features a little longer battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.