Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is incredibly newer than vivo X60 Pro, it is thicker and just a little bit heavier. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, providing you some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Vivo X60 Pro features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse pixel amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7% larger battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots slightly better videos and photos than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos, a more MP back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.