Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the vivo X60 Pro has 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Vivo X60 Pro is a extremely newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it is a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Moto Z Force has a bit more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way more MP camera in the back and faster 60 fps video frame rates. Moto Z Force has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.