Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. Vivo X60 Pro's design is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's thicker and notably heavier. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater number of pixels per inch of display. The vivo X60 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a larger camera aperture, a way larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features more storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X60 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 54 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.