Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a general score of 78.8 against 77.4. Vivo X60 Pro's design is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, but it's somewhat heavier and a lot thicker. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a quite inferior pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a bigger display.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and better video frame rate.
The Moto Z2 Play has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.