Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z3's general score of 77.6. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X60 Pro has older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Vivo X60 Pro's design is newer, but just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto Z3.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
The vivo X60 Pro features a much better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rate, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures, a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Moto Z3 counts with a better storage for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 40 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.