Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Motorola One Hyper is an older, thicker and heavier phone than vivo X60 Pro. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little larger screen. The Motorola One Hyper has a better storage for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot worse resolution back camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.