Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is a little thicker and a little heavier than the vivo X60 Pro. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a quite larger screen.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the same camera sensor size and the same resolution back-facing camera, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Motorola razr (2020)'s memory for games and applications is very similar to vivo X60 Pro's one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.