Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Meteor grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro's score of 78.8. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Nokia 8 V 5G UW's design is incredibly heavier and thicker than vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per screen inch. The vivo X60 Pro has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro features just a little better performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a little better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features just a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.