Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a global score of 78.8 against 75.8. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X60 Pro has the older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The vivo X60 Pro is a newer device, and it is also lighter and notably thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2376px resolution. Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little better performance than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The vivo X60 Pro and the nubia Red Magic 3S count with really similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S captures a little bit better photographs and videos than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and a same resolution camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger camera aperture and a much better video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.