Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Sonic silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. The vivo X60 Pro is a lighter and notably thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even when they were only released with a couple months difference. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the vivo X60 Pro has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, providing the user some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
Vivo X60 Pro has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots slightly better pictures and videos than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger back camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little better battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.