Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, having a global score of 78.8 against 77. Vivo X60 Pro's construction is newer, a little bit lighter and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A20s. Both devices in our current comparison include the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide very similar OS features.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A20s, because it has a bit larger screen, more pixels per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A20s, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.