Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A21, with a overall score of 78.8 against 76.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X60 Pro has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple additional features and a performance increase. The vivo X60 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A21.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, a higher pixels quantity in each inch of display and a little bigger display. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a 5 percent more battery size.
The vivo X60 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.