Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, with a 79.9 score against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's body is much newer, but just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than the vivo X60 Pro. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen. The vivo X60 Pro has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G features greater battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19% greater battery size.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a worse resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.