Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a score of 79.6 against 78.8. The Galaxy A30 is a just a little bit lighter phone than vivo X60 Pro, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro has a superior processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The vivo X60 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a way higher (4K) video definition and a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.