Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30s is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro, having a general score of 79.8 against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A30s is a a bit lighter cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro, but both have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The vivo X60 Pro features a faster processing unit than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Vivo X60 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy A30s, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a little larger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2376 resolution.
The Galaxy A30s counts with a little bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.