Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro, getting an 81.3 score against 78.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A31 is a better cellphone than vivo X60 Pro, we must tell that it is also an older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A31 has 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2376px resolution and a little bit worse pixel quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and a 0.5 inches sensor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The vivo X60 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with greater battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.