Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro's global score of 78.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only and the vivo X60 Pro were released with only 1 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only body is lighter but just a little thicker than the vivo X60 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS, so both should give all the same operating system features.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel count in each screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19% bigger battery capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.