Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a score of 79.4 against 78.8. Although Galaxy A35 5G is a lot newer than vivo X60 Pro, it is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X60 Pro features a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A35 5G features a bit sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a little lower pixels number in each inch in the screen, they both have a display of the same size.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A35 5G features superior battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19 percent larger battery size. Vivo X60 Pro captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality images and videos and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.