Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A40 is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a 79.6 score against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A40's body is way lighter than the vivo X60 Pro, although it's just a little thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system.
Vivo X60 Pro features a superior CPU than Galaxy A40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro and Galaxy A40 count with similar displays, because although the Galaxy A40 has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A40, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.