Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy A41 is older and a bit thicker than vivo X60 Pro, it's design is still lighter. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A41 features a screen that is just as good as the vivo X60 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A41 has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit greater pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same video quality and a back facing camera with a 48 MP, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and better video frame rate.
The vivo X60 Pro features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.