Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s score of 75.8. Vivo X60 Pro is a a lot newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), but it is somewhat heavier. Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
Vivo X60 Pro has a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.