Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a global score of 83.8 against 78.8. The Galaxy A50 design has the same thickness than the vivo X60 Pro, but it's just a bit lighter. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels. The vivo X60 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A50 has a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The vivo X60 Pro has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.