Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a just a little lighter phone than the vivo X60 Pro, but both of them are equally thin.
The vivo X60 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2376px resolution. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
Galaxy A50s has slightly more memory to store more apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the same (4K) video definition and the same resolution camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.