Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's score of 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A51 is an older and a little bit thicker device than vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give you the same operating system features.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little worse pixel density and a little lower 1080 x 2376px resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features slightly more memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the same (4K) video definition and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.