Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than vivo X60 Pro, having a overall score of 90.8 against 78.8. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A51 5G is an older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a just a bit lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Galaxy A51 5G features a better storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit superior battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the vivo X60 Pro also has higher video frame rates and a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.