Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Despite being the best phone we compare here, Galaxy A52's body is just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than the vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2376px resolution and a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger display. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots clearer photographs and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features just a bit better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.