Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a bit heavier and a little thicker phone than the vivo X60 Pro.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger display. The Galaxy A52 5G has a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit superior battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7 percent more battery size. Galaxy A52 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.