Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. Although it's the best in this review, we must highlight that it's also just a bit thicker and a little heavier. These phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the user the same operating system features.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a just a little worse pixel count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with just a little better battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
The Galaxy A52s takes a little bit better pictures and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.