Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy A6's overall score of 75.8. The vivo X60 Pro is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A6, but both are 0.3inches thick. Vivo X60 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a way better 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The vivo X60 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.